Ahead of the crucial Champions League match against Liverpool, PSG may have lost both Neymar and Kylian Mbappé due to injuries.It’s a sad day for football, as PSG got the terrible news that they may lose Neymar and Kylian Mbappé ahead of the crucial Champions League match vs Liverpool due to injuries they suffered while playing for their National Teams.This comes as a huge blow for the French giants, given that these two players are their top players without question.The first one to go down is Neymar Junior, the Brazilian forward was barely starting his friendly match between Brazil and Cameroon when he felt discomfort on his groin right after he took a long-range shot from outside the box.Neymar quickly stopped running and took his hand directly to the affected muscle area, it didn’t take him more than a minute to ask the bench for a substitute as he knew that the injury was serious.Neymar is one of PSG’s biggest leaders this season, but he is the absolute boss for Brazil and suffering a loss like this could be really unfortunate for the Canarinha.The medical staff will have to make the proper tests in order to determine the extent of his injury.Neymar se lesionó en el amistoso de Brasil contra Camerún, a solo 5 minutos de arrancado el partido. pic.twitter.com/YlpTkOoiDh— FM88 Radioactiva (@fm88radioactiva) November 20, 2018Cut to Stade de France where Les Bleus face the Uruguay National Team, a match that had absolutely no importance for the squad’s future but the manager still decided to play his best possible line-up.As it was expected due to the people’s demands, Kylian Mbappé was obviously going to be a starring player for this match and he immediately made his proper impact with the already familiar flashy style of play.The problem was that this youngster had no idea of the unfortunate moment he was about to live, it was during a ball dispute with the Uruguay goalkeeper Martin Campaña.Mbappé went to the challenge and took the worst part, as he fell on top of his right shoulder and suffered an injury that seems quite serious.The young player decided to keep playing for a few minutes so he could test the extent of the injury, but it didn’t take him long to realize that the knock appears to be quite serious as he decided to finally leave the pitch early during the first half.¿Kylian Mbappé? No, Martín Campaña😎Opinion: Neymar will earn respect back from the PSG fans Tomás Pavel Ibarra Meda – September 14, 2019 After completing his incredible return to Parc des Princes, we predict that Neymar will earn the respect back from PSG supporters.The situation between Neymar…Tremendo lo del arquero de #Independiente.📹 @DIRECTVSports#SiempreRojo pic.twitter.com/YL1HGb9OCI— SIEMPRE ROJO 🎙📻🇦🇹 (@siemprerojo_ok) November 20, 2018Both PSG stars are still pending on further tests to see if they will be available for the next couple of matches, manager Thomas Tuchel must be fuming right now because he knows that the next week will be crucial for the club’s future in the Champions League.Paris Saint-Germain will have a massive game at Parc des Princes, where they will play against Liverpool FC and they were expecting to have both of their biggest stars fully fit for the commitment.Out of the two injuries, the one that tends to be more serious is the muscular problem that Neymar had on his groin.However, Mbappé’s shoulder knock could also turn out to be complicated because it could also be a clavicle injury just by judging at the faces of pain that the young player was making when the whole event went down.Any test that should be made for both players will happen between today and tomorrow, we won’t have any definitive prognoses until the test results are made public but we wish that both are nothing but a scare and they can keep delighting us with their amazing skills.Kylian Mbappe goes off injured for France. He follows Neymar in picking up a knock.It’s not been a good night for PSG…France vs Uruguay: https://t.co/cKipvTWrOr pic.twitter.com/cpM5zk9tl3— Indy Football (@IndyFootball) November 20, 2018Which of both injuries do you think is more serious, Neymar’s or Mbappé’s? Please share your opinion in the comment section down below.
KUSI Newsroom Posted: January 24, 2019 KUSI Newsroom, Vista Unified School District All Schools Showcase Categories: Good Morning San Diego, Local San Diego News FacebookTwitter SAN DIEGO (KUSI) – The Vista Unified School District is putting on an All Schools Showcase an impactful and challenging educational program for students.The Mission Vista Steel Drum Ensemble visited Good Morning San Diego to preview what people can expect to see at the showcase.The Showcase will feature:Resource and information booths representing all schoolsOnsite registration and transfersMagnet school information and on site applications will be acceptedThe All Schools Showcase is Thursday, Jan 24 from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. at the Vista Innovation Center located at 836 Olive Ave. Vista, CA 92083For more information click here. January 24, 2019
Galaxy S10 Plus vs iPhone XS Max: photo samples from our comparison Qualcomm’s customers like Apple have argued that’s wrong, and the FTC has agreed, saying Qualcomm charges too much. The heart of the FTC’s case against Qualcomm was a so-called “no license, no chips policy.” Qualcomm sells processors that connect phones to cellular networks, but it also licenses its broad portfolio as a group. For a set fee — based on the selling price of the end device, typically a phone — the manufacturer gets to use all of Qualcomm’s technology. It’s phone makers that pay the licensing fee, not chipmakers. To get access to Qualcomm’s chips, which are broadly considered to be on the bleeding edge of wireless innovation, a phone maker first has to sign a patent licensing contract with Qualcomm. The company has long been the leader in 4G LTE, and it’s ahead of rivals in the nascent 5G market. The highest-end phones, like those from Samsung, have tended to use its modems. But the FTC argued such a requirement hurt competition and cemented Qualcomm’s monopoly power. For tech antitrust, this is the biggest decision since the Microsoft case. Ankur Kapoor, an antitrust partner at Constantine Cannon Apple and Qualcomm settle licensing dispute amid trial’s opening arguments Qualcomm-FTC lawsuit: Everything you need to know Apple and Qualcomm settle: Here’s what the battle means for your next iPhone 22 Photos Other companies, like Huawei and Lenovo, made similar comments during their testimony. And during the trial, the FTC pointed to communication from a former Qualcomm licensing executive, Eric Reifschneider, to mobile chip customers like Motorola and Sony Mobile as evidence of threats to cut off supply. In one instance, Reifschneider wrote in an email to a Sony Mobile executive that “QCT (Qualcomm’s chip business) has been shipping chips to SMC (Sony Mobile) for almost three weeks now without a license in place. It will not be possible for that to continue.” Qualcomm, meanwhile, called company executives, representatives from handset makers and chip rivals, and economics experts to dispute the FTC’s allegations in the case. The company sought to show that competition is healthy in the mobile chip market and that Qualcomm hasn’t hampered the industry. The company has argued that its broad patent portfolio and innovations justify its fees. CEO Steve Mollenkopf, who was called by the FTC early in the trial, defended the company’s licensing practices, saying the way his company sells chips to smartphone makers is best for everybody involved and is the simplest way to license the technology. Executives from Qualcomm and other companies testified that Qualcomm has never cut off chip supply during contract negotiations. Some of those executives said in live testimony and video depositions presented by Qualcomm that its rivals didn’t have the technology required for their devices. Qualcomm also argued that it had legitimate business reasons for having strict contracts with Apple, including how expensive it is to design modems specifically for Apple. The ruling’s remediesEarlier this month, the US Justice Department asked for a hearing on Qualcomm’s possible punishment if Koh ruled in the FTC’s favor. The DOJ said the court should carefully consider what remedy to carry out, because it’s worried about the US’ position in the race to 5G. But Koh denied the hearing request. Koh, in her ruling, said Qualcomm has to comply with five remedies:”Qualcomm must not condition the supply of modem chips on a customer’s patent license status and must negotiate or renegotiate license terms with customers in good faith under conditions free from the threat of lack of access to or discriminatory provision of modem chip supply or associated technical support or access to software. “Qualcomm must make exhaustive SEP licenses available to modem-chip suppliers on fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory (“FRAND”) terms and submit, as necessary, to arbitral or judicial dispute resolution to determine such terms. “Qualcomm may not enter express or de facto exclusive dealing agreements for the supply of modem chips. “Qualcomm may not interfere with the ability of any customer to communicate with a government agency about a potential law enforcement or regulatory matter. “In order to ensure Qualcomm’s compliance with the above remedies, the court orders Qualcomm to submit to compliance and monitoring procedures for a period of seven years. Specifically, Qualcomm shall report to the FTC on an annual basis Qualcomm’s compliance with the above remedies ordered by the court.”The first and second remedies are “the most onerous, requiring renegotiation of existing licenses, and mandating offering chipset licenses (which, as always, opens up the possibility of chipset-level royalties and the specter of patent exhaustion),” Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon noted. “In practice, we don’t know what will happen next.” Making nice with AppleWhile Apple was one of Qualcomm’s fiercest critics, the two settled their disputes in April. The two sides announced the surprise agreement through a joint press release on April 16 at the same time lawyers presented opening arguments in their trial in a San Diego courthouse. Apple and its contract manufacturers had given their statements, and Qualcomm’s head lawyer had nearly finished his remarks when the courtroom buzzed with the unexpected news. The CEOs of both companies — Apple’s Tim Cook and Qualcomm’s Steve Mollenkopf — had been expected to testify. As recently as January, Cook said the iPhone maker wasn’t in talks with Qualcomm. As part of the agreement, Apple will make a payment to Qualcomm for an undisclosed sum. The licensing pact, taking effect April 1, 2019, will last for six years and includes a two-year extension option. Apple and Qualcomm also signed a multiyear chipset supply agreement, which means Qualcomm modems could soon make their way back into iPhones. CNET’s Shelby Brown contributed to this report. Originally published May 22, 6:20 a.m. PT Updates, 8:05 a.m.: Adds comments from ruling, comments from antitrust lawyer, additional information; 11:46 a.m.: Includes comment from FTC, analyst and lawyer and adds more information about remedies. 1:50 p.m.: Adds analyst comment. Share your voice See also Powerful chipmaker Qualcomm is just too powerful, judge… Aug 31 • Your phone screen is gross. Here’s how to clean it Now playing: Watch this: Qualcomm illegally hurt competitors in the wireless chip market and used its dominant position to force unnecessary licensing fees on handset makers like Apple, US District Court Judge Lucy Koh said in a long-awaited ruling issued late Tuesday.Qualcomm must change how it does business and renegotiate license deals with its customers, according to the ruling, which came four months after a trial over the issue ended. To hold the company accountable, Qualcomm must also submit compliance and monitoring reports for the next seven years and report to the US Federal Trade Commission on an annual basis. “Qualcomm’s licensing practices have strangled competition in the CDMA and premium LTE modem chip markets for years, and harmed rivals, OEMs, and end consumers in the process,” Koh wrote in her ruling. Tags Aug 31 • iPhone XR vs. iPhone 8 Plus: Which iPhone should you buy? Apple reading • Qualcomm is a monopoly and must renegotiate deals, judge rules Post a comment The two sides battled in a San Jose, California, courtroom for most of January. The FTC wrapped up its antitrust case against the company on Jan. 15, and Qualcomm rested its defense 10 days later. Both sides presented closing arguments Jan. 29. The trial revealed the inner workings of tech’s most important business, smartphones, showing how suppliers wrestle for dominance and profit. For Qualcomm, the verdict calls into question the company’s entire business model. While it sells processors that connect devices to mobile networks, it also generates a significant percentage of its revenue from licensing. If it can’t collect royalties based on the value of a handset — which it had done in the past — it will generate less money and may have to rethink its model entirely. Even if it appeals the ruling, Qualcomm’s licensees likely will try to alter their contracts. Koh, in her ruling, said that Qualcomm can’t force a customer to sign a license before it will supply it with chips. It “must negotiate or renegotiate license terms with customers in good faith under conditions free from the threat of lack of access to or discriminatory provision of modem chip supply or associated technical support or access to software.Appealing the ruling It’s unclear what impact the ruling will have on Qualcomm’s recent settlement with Apple, but it’s likely that deal took into account a ruling in favor of the FTC. Ultimately, the case could take years to resolve as it works its way through the appeals process. Apple “just signed an agreement that was quite favorable for [Qualcomm] … and of course needs QCOM modems for its 5G phone in 2020,” UBS analysts noted. “It seems highly unlikely that this news would impact the recent multi-year AAPL settlement.”It typically takes the 9th Circuit about two to three years to issue rulings in antitrust cases, said Ankur Kapoor, an antitrust partner at Constantine Cannon. It’s likely the court will fast-track the case, which means it could have a decision in about a year, he said. “For tech antitrust, this is the biggest decision since the Microsoft case,” Kapoor said. In the meantime, the 9th Circuit probably will grant Qualcomm an emergency stay of the injunction that forces it to change its practices. For Qualcomm’s appeal, it’ll have to focus on the legal basis of the ruling. “The only chance for Qualcomm to overturn this on appeal is on a pure question of law, a pure legal issue,” he added. “The big one is whether or not violation of FRAND obligations can constitute an antitrust violation or if it’s just a breach of contract.” Qualcomm’s chip dominance Qualcomm is the world’s biggest provider of mobile chips, and it created technology that’s essential for connecting phones to cellular networks. The company derives a significant portion of its revenue from licensing those inventions to hundreds of device makers, with the fee based on the value of the phone, not the components. Because Qualcomm owns patents related to 3G, 4G and 5G networking technology, as well as other features like software, all handset makers building a device that connects to cellular networks have to pay it a licensing fee, even if they don’t use Qualcomm’s chips. Aug 31 • iPhone 11, Apple Watch 5 and more: The final rumors Phones Components Tech Industry • In a statement, Qualcomm said it would immediately seek a stay of the district court’s judgement and an expedited appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. “We strongly disagree with the judge’s conclusions, her interpretation of the facts and her application of the law,” Don Rosenberg, executive vice president and general counsel for Qualcomm, said in a statement Wednesday. FTC Competition Director Bruce Hoffman said in a statement Wednesday that “yesterday’s decision that Qualcomm’s practices violate the antitrust laws is an important win for competition in a key segment of the economy. FTC staff will remain vigilant in pursuing unilateral conduct by technology firms that harms the competitive process.”Apple, which played a big role in the FTC’s case, declined to comment.The ruling is a boon for Qualcomm’s customers and rivals, many of which supported the FTC’s case in hopes of securing lower licensing deals and getting greater access to the mobile market. Apple in particular played a large role in the case, with executives, such as Chief Operating Officer Jeff Williams, testifying that they felt they had no option but to agree to Qualcomm’s terms. If Apple didn’t give into Qualcomm’s demands, he said, it worried about losing access to Qualcomm’s chips. During the trial, the FTC argued Qualcomm’s licensing policies hurt consumers by causing higher smartphone pricing. But even though Koh ruled in the FTC’s favor, there’s little chance that handset makers like Apple and Samsung will lower their prices. Instead, even as Qualcomm has lowered its licensing rates, prices for the latest and greatest devices from those companies and others have continued to rise. Antitrust arguments The decision comes more than two years after the FTC accused Qualcomm of operating a monopoly in wireless chips. The FTC said Qualcomm forced customers like Apple to work exclusively with it and charged “excessive” licensing fees for its technology, in part by wielding a “no license, no chips” policy. Qualcomm’s practices prevented rivals from entering the market, drove up the cost of phones and in turn hurt consumers, who faced higher handset prices, the FTC said. Qualcomm argued the FTC’s lawsuit was based on “flawed legal theory” and that customers choose its chips because they’re the best. It also argued that competition is fierce in the mobile chip market and that Qualcomm never stopped providing processors to customers, even when they’ve been arguing over licenses. Qualcomm’s licensing practices have strangled competition. Judge Lucy Koh 1:48 0 Aug 31 • Best places to sell your used electronics in 2019 See All For the FTC to win the case, it had to show that Qualcomm had a monopoly, that it had market power and that it used that power in negotiations with handset makers to command high royalties. The FTC also had to show that Qualcomm’s conduct hurt competitors and that the anticompetitive actions continue or will start again in the future. The FTC argued that Qualcomm used its power in the 3G and 4G chip market to force handset makers like Apple to sign licensing agreements with excessively high royalties. If Qualcomm isn’t stopped, the FTC said, it’ll do the same thing in the 5G market. “If the decision is sustained, it will require a change in Qualcomm’s business practices,” said Cornell Law antitrust professor George Hay. “While any changes that are implemented will have no immediate impact on their dominance in the chip market, over time it may lead to more competition.” Battling in court During the trial, the FTC called witnesses from companies like Apple, Samsung, Intel and Huawei and had experts testify about the alleged harm Qualcomm’s licensing practices have caused the mobile industry. Apple’s Williams testified that his company felt it had to sign contracts for amounts it thought too high — a royalty of $7.50 per iPhone — to maintain access to Qualcomm’s chips. “We were staring at an increase of over $1 billion per year in licensing, so we had a gun to our head,” Williams said as he explained why Apple signed another licensing agreement in 2013, despite being unhappy with the terms. He added that Apple has wanted to use Qualcomm’s chips for its newer devices, but Qualcomm refused to sell processors for the iPhone. Qualcomm 5G 4G LTE Apple FTC
Listen at WEAA Live Stream: http://amber.streamguys.com.4020/live.m3u From 5-7 P.M.On this July 4th, we rebroadcast our June 28, 2016 show that discusses the Obama administration policy, which allows inmates to receive Pell grants for higher education. Our guests include: Kevin Shird, author of, “Lessons of Redemption,” and the forthcoming book, “Uprising in the City: Made in America,” and Ron Stanley, an entrepreneur and ex-convict who receive one of his two degrees while still incarcerated.These stories and much more on AFRO’s First Edition with Sean Yoes.
By Sean Yoes, Baltimore AFRO Editor, email@example.comKwame Kilpatrick, the former Detroit mayor who began his political career with so much promise, has spent the last seven years incarcerated, on a 28-year-sentence after being convicted of 24 felonies.Now, Kilpatrick is reaching out to Donald Trump for a presidential pardon.Kwame Kilpatrick, 48, the ex-Mayor of Detroit, is currently serving a 28-year sentence for corruption. He is currently being housed in the Federal Detention Center in Philadelphia. (Facebook Photo)“Our country has always been the land of 2nd Chances!” reads the Facebook post signed by Kilpatrick. “I am hoping, confidently expecting, that I will have the opportunity to boldly move into the next season of my life; outside of these prison walls…I pray that I will receive the opportunity for Pardon/Clemency from the President of the United States as well.”Kilpatrick is seeking a Trump pardon, as the president has recently dangled the possibility of high profile pardons for Martha Stewart and Rod Blagojevich (former Gov. of Illinois), both former contestants of Trump’s former reality show, “The Apprentice.” Last month, Trump posthumously pardoned Jack Johnson, the first Black heavyweight champion of the world. Early this month he pardoned Alice Johnson, who was convicted of drug charges, after being lobbied by Kim Kardashian West.Kilpatrick, a Democrat, was first elected Mayor of Detroit in 2001, at the age of 31, the youngest mayor in the city’s history. But, Kilpatrick resigned his office in 2008 after being convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice revealed through a text messaging scandal between Kilpatrick and Christine Beatty, his chief of staff, (the duo were engaged in an extramarital affair). Kilpatrick was sentenced to four months in jail and released on probation after serving 99 days.In 2010, he was sentenced to 18 months to five years in state prison for violating his probation. In 2013, Kilpatrick was convicted of 24 felonies (connected to his time as mayor), including wire fraud, mail fraud and racketeering and was sentenced to 28 years.“Yes, I have made some very bad decisions in my life. Yes, I betrayed my wife and family because of my own lust and sin. Yes, I failed to deliver on the promises and opportunities that was given to me by the people of Detroit, Michigan. And yes, I have been severely punished for it,” wrote Kilpatrick. “My family has forgiven me. I have asked the people of the city of Detroit for forgiveness many times. And most Detroiters have forgiven me as well…I pray that I will receive the opportunity for Pardon/Clemency from the President of the United States.”A Trump pardon of Kilpatrick would wipe out his convictions, clemency would shorten his prison sentence.If he served his full sentence, the earliest Kilpatrick, who is married with three children, could be released from prison is 2037 at age 67.