Categories: Local San Diego News FacebookTwitter June 20, 2018 John Soderman City council looking for ways to rein in dockless bikes and scooters Posted: June 20, 2018 John Soderman, 00:00 00:00 spaceplay / pause qunload | stop ffullscreenshift + ←→slower / faster ↑↓volume mmute ←→seek . seek to previous 12… 6 seek to 10%, 20% … 60% XColor SettingsAaAaAaAaTextBackgroundOpacity SettingsTextOpaqueSemi-TransparentBackgroundSemi-TransparentOpaqueTransparentFont SettingsSize||TypeSerif MonospaceSerifSans Serif MonospaceSans SerifCasualCursiveSmallCapsResetSave SettingsSAN DIEGO (CNS) – A San Diego City Council committee today agreed to create a working group to explore the creation of a permit and fee system for companies providing dockless bikes and scooters.The dockless transportation options were introduced in San Diego in February by companies including Ofo, Lime Bike and Bird.Although the devices align with local climate action goals and offer an affordable solution for the first and last mile of a daily commute, city officials have said they also create chronic nuisance issues.Vehicles are frequently parked in business and transit entrances, but operating companies aren’t always quick to relocate them. Users also, at times, exhibit poor etiquette by riding on sidewalks, riding without helmets and in some cases throwing vehicles into “bodies of water and off cliffs,” said Ray Khan, policy adviser for City Councilwoman Barbara Bry.During a presentation to the council’s Budget and Governmental Efficiency Committee, Khan outlined several potential payment options to fund dockless vehicle infrastructure, user education and enforcement mechanisms.Other cities across the country have implemented their own policies as dockless vehicles have exploded in popularity. Proactive regulations on the city’s part could prevent headaches, Bry said.“It’s a new technology, and I think we’ve let other new technologies — I’ll say Airbnb — get ahead of us in terms of how we as a city deal with it,” she said. “…We all want this to work for everyone, and we have to figure out the best way to accomplish it.”Khan outlined several potential payment mechanisms used elsewhere, including operator application fees, annual per-bike fees and bike-removal fees.He also noted a handful of regulations and practices that could be used by city staff and operators to alleviate dockless vehicle-related issues.One potential policy: a response requirement — typically two hours — for parking complaints.Behavior could be improved with additional education, including videos within the application reminding users of local laws, he said. Other cities also use incentive programs to reward users who obey regulations, or show good etiquette by relocating vehicles from improper parking spots.Dockless infrastructure in other regions has also proved effective, Khan said. Some cities stripe off dockless parking areas, or install vehicle corrals on sidewalks and unused parking spots.A dockless vehicle study conducted in Seattle showed that 70 percent of bikes were parked correctly after corrals were installed.“This is usually a creative solution to solving the clutter issue we see with different bike providers,” Khan said. The Seattle study also found that 75 percent of dockless bikers used the vehicles to access transit.Khan said vehicle operators could share data with the city to identify high-use areas in need of infrastructure.Councilwoman Georgette Gomez, a dockless scooter user, said improved infrastructure should precede regulations and fees. “If you don’t have the infrastructure, then people are still utilizing (a dockless vehicle) but they’re utilizing it in a way that makes them safe — and perhaps sidewalks are those spaces. Is it right? No. But we need to deliver that infrastructure,” she said.Councilman Chris Ward proposed the creation of a stakeholder working group with city staff, council staff, residents, business owners and operators.Local Ofo General Manager Paul Vidal, who attended Wednesday’s meeting, said his company is receptive to community concerns.“There is a learning curve. All of us have gone through it, but we take it seriously,” he said. “If it’s picking up bikes and putting them in better places, or making them safer overall — we’ll do whatever we can.”
The FCC has adopted some policies to reduce the number of calls people get. The agency has changed rules to allow phone companies to block suspected robocalls by default, and it’s closed loopholes to go after illegal robocallers overseas. Congress has also stepped in to ensure the agency has what it needs to give its policies teeth. In May the Senate passed the Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence (TRACED) Act with more than 80 co-sponsors. The bill is designed to improve enforcement policies, such as criminalizing illegal robocalling, and also improve coordination between agencies policing robocalls. It also requires phone companies to use the SHAKEN/STIR protocol. Now playing: Watch this: How to stop robocalls Share your voice Comment Tags FCC 2:42 (From left) Attorneys General Leslie Rutledge of Arkansas, Josh Stein of North Carolina and Gordon MacDonald of New Hampshire join Patrick Halley, a senior vice president at US Telecom, at a press conference in Washington, DC, to unveil a new agreement with 12 phone companies to help stop illegal robocalls. Screenshot by Marguerite Reardon/CNET States are banding together with large telecom companies to combat robocalls. Twelve of the nation’s largest telephone companies struck an agreement Thursday with the attorneys general of all 50 states to help prevent and block robocalls. Under the agreement, the companies have promised to implement the SHAKEN/STIR technology, which would validate that calls are originating from where they claim to be coming from and would allow for faster tracing of illegal calls to find out who’s responsible for them, North Carolina State Attorney General Josh Stein said during a press conference announcing the agreement. The companies also promised to work with state law enforcement to investigate the origins of illegal robocalls, including confirming the identities of their commercial customers suspected of making such calls. The companies will also make free call-blocking technology available to consumers. Getty Images Stein said the partnership with the phone companies is just the beginning and isn’t a silver bullet in stopping these unwanted and annoying calls. “Thanks to these prevention principles, our phones will ring less often,” he said. “But unfortunately there will always be bad actors no matter how well we try to prevent these calls. Some will get through and that’s why enforcement is such a critical part of what we’re doing today.”Still, he said that “by shining a light on these robocallers, we will be able to aggressively enforce the law against the scofflaws and hold them accountable.”The agreement is voluntary, and there’s no deadline for compliance. Smaller phone companies haven’t yet signed on to the agreement. The larger carriers that’ve signed on say they’re committed to working with the states and federal government to end the scourge of illegal robocalls. “We’re in the midst of an ongoing battle with those responsible for sending annoying and often deceptive spam calls to our customers, and we’re determined to fight this battle,” Kathy Grillo, a senior vice president for government affairs at Verizon, said in a statement. “It’s imperative that we stand together on a common set of goals that include stopping callers from hiding their identities, working with other carriers on efforts to trace back illegal calls to the source, and keeping the originators from sending robocalls in the first place.”Americans received nearly 50 billion robocalls last year, according to a Federal Communications Commission report released in February. Nearly 50% of those calls were from scammers. The report also highlighted that the number of complaints about illegal robocalls has been increasing, jumping from 172,000 complaints in 2015 to 232,000 complaints in 2018.Robocalls use autodialers and recorded messages to make millions of phone calls. Often the numbers that show up in caller ID appear to belong to friends or neighbors, when they’re actually “spoofed.” These calls hide the real number to trick people into answering the call.FCC Chairman Ajit Pai applauded the phone companies for working with states to stop illegal robocalls, and he said the principles align with what the FCC has been doing. “Few things can bring together policy leaders across the political spectrum like the fight against unwanted robocalls,” Pai said. ” I salute today’s bipartisan, nationwide effort to encourage best practices for combating robocalls and spoofing and am pleased that several voice service providers have agreed to abide by them.” Mobile 1
Listen at WEAA Live Stream: http://amber.streamguys.com.4020/live.m3u From 5-7 P.M.On this July 4th, we rebroadcast our June 28, 2016 show that discusses the Obama administration policy, which allows inmates to receive Pell grants for higher education. Our guests include: Kevin Shird, author of, “Lessons of Redemption,” and the forthcoming book, “Uprising in the City: Made in America,” and Ron Stanley, an entrepreneur and ex-convict who receive one of his two degrees while still incarcerated.These stories and much more on AFRO’s First Edition with Sean Yoes.
Rooney’s strike added to a comedy own-goal by Kieran Gibbs that saw the left-back deflect Antonio Valencia’s cross into his own net after a mix-up with goalkeeper Wojciech Szczesny, who was injured in the process. Olivier Giroud, on as a second-half substitute, replied deep into stoppage time for Arsenal, but United held on to record a first competitive away win since April 5. The victory took Louis van Gaal’s side back into the Champions League places, 13 points behind leaders Chelsea. Also Read – Khel Ratna for Deepa and Bajrang, Arjuna for JadejaArsenal manager Arsene Wenger was left to rue an afternoon of wasted opportunities and inspired goalkeeping by United’s David de Gea, as well as injuries to Szczesny and Jack Wilshere.Arsenal produced a lightning start at the Emirates and should have been out of sight in th e first quarter of the match. Ex-United striker Danny Welbeck was presented with a sight of goal after Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain had been allowed to run in-field, but he was denied by Paddy McNair.United took the lead in the 56th minute in comical fashion. Szczesny clattered Gibbs as he came for Young’s deep cross and when Valencia smashed the rebound back into the area, Arsenal’s left-back diverted the ball into his own net. Arsenal pushed for a leveller, but they were undone on the counter-attack as Di Maria supplied Rooney, who raced clear and chipped the ball over Martinez in the second half.